A structured approach to evaluating the relative creditworthiness of issuers and investment opportunities listed on the KLDX platform.
Each issuer is assessed across four dimensions, each sub-criterion is scored individually and contributes to overall assessment.
While the KLDX Credit Scoring Matrix is applied consistently, the relative weighting assigned to each risk dimension may vary depending on the industry, business model, stage of development, and transaction-specific risk profile.
KLDX adopts a principles-based and risk-sensitive approach, recognising that no single weighting structure is appropriate for all issuers or asset classes.
| Issuer / Transaction Profile | Higher Emphasis | Lower Emphasis |
|---|---|---|
| Asset-heavy infrastructure or project-based transaction | Financial risk, cash flow stability, contractual support | Market positioning |
| Early-stage or growth-oriented issuers | Business risk, management capability, shareholder support | Historical financial metrics |
| Regulated or policy-driven sectors | Industry and regulatory risk | Competitive dynamics |
| Issuers with strong shareholder or parental support | Structural support and guarantees | Standalone financial profile |
Any weighting adjustments are documented in the credit rationale and reviewed as part of KLDX's internal governance process.
KLDX follows a structured internal credit assessment process, informed by established market practices. The process may be refined or amended from time to time to reflect regulatory requirements, operational evolution, or changes in risk governance.
Request for initial corporate, business, financial, and transaction-specific information. Review available information, financial statements, and credit documentation.
Assessment of completeness, consistency, and relevance. Requests for clarification or additional information where required.
Discussions with management on business operations, strategy, financial performance, and key risks. Site visits or operational reviews, where applicable.
Preparation of an internal credit assessment report. Identification of key risk drivers, strengths, and weaknesses. Application of the credit scoring matrix and rationale.
Review by relevant internal personnel or committees. Determination of final internal credit views.
Preparation of a draft summary for internal use or factual verification.
Confirmation of factual accuracy. Incorporation of clarifications or corrections.
Finalisation and documentation of the internal credit assessment. Use for disclosure, decision-making, and monitoring purposes.
Each assessment criterion is scored on a 0 to 5 scale, reflecting KLDX's internal view of risk and performance.
| Score | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| 5 | Best – Lowest risk; excellent performance |
| 4 | Good – Low risk; above-average performance |
| 3 | Acceptable – Medium risk; average performance |
| 2 | Poor – High risk; below-average performance |
| 1 | Worst – Unacceptable risk; critical weaknesses |
| 0 | Missing data – Insufficient information available |
| Weighted Score Range | Credit Band | Assessment Risk Profile |
|---|---|---|
| 0.0 – <1.0 | Band 1 | Very high repayment risk |
| 1.0 – <2.0 | Band 2 | High repayment risk |
| 2.0 – <3.0 | Band 3 | Medium repayment risk |
| 3.0 – <4.0 | Band 4 | Low repayment risk |
| 4.0 – 5.0 | Band 5 | Lowest repayment risk |
The KLDX credit scoring framework and assessment process are subject to internal governance and oversight and may be:
KLDX reserves the right to amend, update, or refine its credit scoring methodology and assessment process without prior notice.
The credit score is not a recommendation to subscribe, purchase, sell, or hold any securities, nor does it constitute legal, accounting, tax, or investment advice. Investors should conduct their own independent assessment and seek professional advice where appropriate.
all the latest news on KLDX, updates, products and opportunities
By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Platform Terms and Conditions.